1964 and earlier | Persons, thousand | All 50+ population | | 376.4 |
No chenge in health self-assessment | | 231.5 |
Decline by at least 2 scale points | | 9.6 |
Decline from excelent, very good or good to satisfactory or bad | | 43.2 |
Persons, % | All 50+ population | | 100 |
No chenge in health self-assessment | | 61.5 |
Decline by at least 2 scale points | | 2.6 |
Decline from excelent, very good or good to satisfactory or bad | | 11.5 |
1960-1964 | Persons, thousand | All 50+ population | | 14.5 |
No chenge in health self-assessment | | 8 |
Decline by at least 2 scale points | | 0.8 |
Decline from excelent, very good or good to satisfactory or bad | | 2.1 |
Persons, % | All 50+ population | | 100 |
No chenge in health self-assessment | | 55.1 |
Decline by at least 2 scale points | | 5.7 |
Decline from excelent, very good or good to satisfactory or bad | | 14.2 |
1955-1959 | Persons, thousand | All 50+ population | | 65.2 |
No chenge in health self-assessment | | 37.5 |
Decline by at least 2 scale points | | 2.2 |
Decline from excelent, very good or good to satisfactory or bad | | 9.1 |
Persons, % | All 50+ population | | 100 |
No chenge in health self-assessment | | 57.6 |
Decline by at least 2 scale points | | 3.3 |
Decline from excelent, very good or good to satisfactory or bad | | 14 |
1950-1954 | Persons, thousand | All 50+ population | | 65.8 |
No chenge in health self-assessment | | 39.2 |
Decline by at least 2 scale points | | 1.5 |
Decline from excelent, very good or good to satisfactory or bad | | 8.4 |
Persons, % | All 50+ population | | 100 |
No chenge in health self-assessment | | 59.6 |
Decline by at least 2 scale points | | 2.3 |
Decline from excelent, very good or good to satisfactory or bad | | 12.7 |
1945-1949 | Persons, thousand | All 50+ population | | 67.4 |
No chenge in health self-assessment | | 41.3 |
Decline by at least 2 scale points | | 1.1 |
Decline from excelent, very good or good to satisfactory or bad | | 9 |
Persons, % | All 50+ population | | 100 |
No chenge in health self-assessment | | 61.2 |
Decline by at least 2 scale points | | 1.7 |
Decline from excelent, very good or good to satisfactory or bad | | 13.3 |
1940-1945 | Persons, thousand | All 50+ population | | 51.9 |
No chenge in health self-assessment | | 33.4 |
Decline by at least 2 scale points | | 1.2 |
Decline from excelent, very good or good to satisfactory or bad | | 5.6 |
Persons, % | All 50+ population | | 100 |
No chenge in health self-assessment | | 64.5 |
Decline by at least 2 scale points | | 2.3 |
Decline from excelent, very good or good to satisfactory or bad | | 10.9 |
1935-1939 | Persons, thousand | All 50+ population | | 52.6 |
No chenge in health self-assessment | | 33.4 |
Decline by at least 2 scale points | | 1.6 |
Decline from excelent, very good or good to satisfactory or bad | | 5.7 |
Persons, % | All 50+ population | | 100 |
No chenge in health self-assessment | | 63.5 |
Decline by at least 2 scale points | | 3 |
Decline from excelent, very good or good to satisfactory or bad | | 10.8 |
1930-1934 | Persons, thousand | All 50+ population | | 36.3 |
No chenge in health self-assessment | | 24.5 |
Decline by at least 2 scale points | | 0.8 |
Decline from excelent, very good or good to satisfactory or bad | | 2.1 |
Persons, % | All 50+ population | | 100 |
No chenge in health self-assessment | | 67.3 |
Decline by at least 2 scale points | | 2.2 |
Decline from excelent, very good or good to satisfactory or bad | | 5.7 |
1929 and earlier | Persons, thousand | All 50+ population | | 22.8 |
No chenge in health self-assessment | | 14.1 |
Decline by at least 2 scale points | | 0.5 |
Decline from excelent, very good or good to satisfactory or bad | | 1.3 |
Persons, % | All 50+ population | | 100 |
No chenge in health self-assessment | | 62 |
Decline by at least 2 scale points | | 2.1 |
Decline from excelent, very good or good to satisfactory or bad | | 5.6 |